Strongly Typed Notifications in Swift


While working on rewriting Spotijack in Swift, I started to feel dissatisfied with Foundation’s notification API. It’s a stringly typed API that makes heavy use of Any and as someone who loves their types this makes me sad. To cheer myself up, I set about writing a more strongly typed notification system.

The end result is a small library1TypedNotification—that provides a set of protocols defining a more descriptive type system for notifications. Check out the GitHub project if you’re interested. There’s a Playground in it demoing the protocols. The rest of this blog post will cover them in a bit more detail.


Before I show you the protocols, let me run you through what I wanted to achieve.

Closure Based API

First, I wanted to have a closure based API that closely mirrors the foundation API. Swift has a concise syntax for closures that makes it easy to create short pieces of code. For longer blocks of code, Swift has function references that let functions be used as closures. Furthermore, closures encapsulate information on the types of their arguments which selectors lack. The foundation API already contains a block based function for notifications so my protocol can simply mimic that API.

Notifications as Types

The second requirement is for notifications to convey as much information as possible using their types. That means no identifying notifications by a string (at least, not to the user) and no userInfo dictionary to attach data to a notification. A notification’s identifier should be inherent to its type and any data attached to the notification should be declared as properties.

Automatic Removal of Observers

Finally, I wanted to get rid of the need to think about the lifetime of observers. The block based foundation API returns an opaque object that users must remember to unregister before it is deallocated. Forgetting to manage these objects creates bugs that are difficult to pass off as features.

The TypedNotifcation Protocol


This is the core protocol of TypedNotifications. Types that conform to this protocol can be posted as notifications. The protocol declaration is simple:

protocol TypedNotification: Namespaced {
    associatedtype Sender
    /// The name of the notification to be used as an identifier.
    static var name: String { get }
    /// The object sending the notification.
    var sender: Sender { get }

All types conforming to TypedNotification have a name property that’s used to identify the notification and a sender property that’s used to identify the sender. The sender property has an associated type that can be used to constrain senders to a subset of types.

This protocol reduces the chances of making a mistake with the stringly typed notification system by only having to declare the name of the notification once. It also adds some information about the contents of the notification by providing an associated type for the sender property.

To reduce the chances of a notification name collision, I’ve made the TypedNotification protocol conform to a Namespaced protocol which looks like:

protocol Namespaced {
    static var namespace: String { get }

A protocol extension on TypedNotifcation uses the Namespaced protocol to provide a default implementation for the name property:

extension TypedNotification {
    static var name: String {
        return "\(Self.namespace).\(Self.self)"

This will generate a notification name using the namespace property and the name of the type conforming to TypedNotifcation.


For each notification that your application posts, create a type that conforms to TypedNotification and implement the required properties. Thanks to the aforementioned protocol extension, only the sender and namespace properties need to be implemented. You can write a protocol extension on Namespaced to reduce the implementation down to just the sender property. As an example:

extension Namespaced {
    static var namespace: String { return "org.alexj" }

struct ExampleNotification: TypedNotification {
    let sender: ExampleClass
    let newValue: Double

Here, ExampleClass is the only class that’s responsible for sending instances of ExampleNotification. If multiple types can post a notification, consider constraining the sender property using a protocol. If worst comes to worst, you can make sender an instance of Any? at the expense of some type safety.

The TypedNotificationCenter Protocol


To post instances of TypedNotifcation, the library provides another protocol called TypedNotificationCenter. This declares three methods to post notifications, add observers and remove observers:

protocol TypedNotificationCenter {
    /// Post a `TypedNotification`
    func post<T: TypedNotification>(_ notification: T)
    /// Register a block to be executed when a `TypedNotification` is posted.
    func addObserver<T: TypedNotification>(forType type: T.Type, object obj: T.Sender?,
                     queue: OperationQueue?, using block: @escaping (T) -> Void) -> NotificationObserver
    /// Deregister a `NotificationObserver`.
    func removeObserver(observer: NotificationObserver)

Aside from a different type signature, these methods mirror the Foundation NotificationCenter APIs. TypedNotification includes an extension on NotificationCenter that adds conformance to the TypedNotificationCenter protocol. You can use the protocol when writing tests.

The NotifcationObserver Class

The addObserver method returns an instance of NotificationObserver rather than the NSObjectProtocol conforming object returned by the Foundation API. NotificationObserver is a lightweight class that stores an NSObjectProtocol conforming object. When a NotificationObserver is deallocated, removeObserver is automatically called. There’s no need to manually remove observers any more, just store2 a strong reference to the NotificationObserver.


Usage is almost identical to using the Foundation API. Building on the previous example, here’s how to use a TypedNotification conforming type with NotificationCenter:

class ExampleClass {
    private let center = NotificationCenter.default
    private var _valueObserver: NotificationObserver? = nil

    init() {
        _valueObserver = center.addObserver(forType: ExampleNotification.self, object: self, queue: nil) { (noti) in
            print("New value: \(noti.newValue)")

    var value = 0.0 {
        didSet {
   self, newValue: value))

Note that the closure parameter noti is of type ExampleNotification so you can directly access the newValue property without any downcasting. Also note that the observer is tied to the lifetime of ExampleClass. When an instance of ExampleClass is deallocated, _valueObserver will remove itself as an observer.


I think the advantages of this library compared to the Foundation API are clear. Representing notifications as types improves the safety of your code by eliminating manually managed string identifiers and weakly typed userInfo dictionaries. A further advantage of typed notifications is self-documentation. As data attached to a notification is part of the type, there’s no need to document the keys of a userInfo dictionary. Users can look at the public interface of a TypedNotification conforming type to see what data it provides.

The TypedNotificationCenter protocol goes hand in hand with the TypedNotification protocol. It improves run time safety by automatically removing observers when they are deallocated, eliminating an entire class of bugs. Furthermore, it provides a starting point for writing tests for notifications.

The TypedNotification library is available from GitHub under an MIT license. It is compatible with the Swift Package Manager and Carthage.

  1. I believe the cool kids call this a µFramework. [return]
  2. Xcode will emit a warning if you don’t store the returned NotificationObserver. It might be a good idea to enable “Treat Warnings as Errors” in your build settings. [return]